Over 59557

Sen Politics

Socialist Screwball -

Democrat Robert C. Byrd -

Bernie the Sadistic Pervert -

TAGS: bernie sanders gang ra** fantasies p***ert sadistic codger democrat cretin liberal nut job progressive hack socialist vermont moron senile communist
Rating: 4.79/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

Pikeman - November 4, 2015, 9:11 am
Jeb my he drop out of the race Bush is a better candidate than Bernie.
Cannabal - May 29, 2015, 5:37 pm
Still a better candidate than ANYONE else.

Senile Socialist -

TAGS: bernie sanders senile socialist liberal democrat progressive commie codger vermont vermin hippies moonbats feel the bern
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

OTC - September 22, 2015, 11:38 pm
Well, he didn't say "paid" vacation

Bernie Sanders 2016 -

a congress of baboons -


THE VEEP DEBATE - This will be the most one-sided affair since the first Gulf War. We can't wait.

Liberal Hypocrisy -

TAGS: liberal hypocrisy ronald reagan too old bernie sanders senile socialist democrat liberal hippie vermont marxist
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

ipaprime - September 16, 2015, 1:14 am
Well they must believe that whoever he picks as his vp will carry on his policies when he has to step down.

Bernie Sanders 2016 -



HIGH CHEEKBONES - Useful for keeping those liberal tears in place for the cameras

HEY OBAMA.... - How much did you want for your seat again?

Socialist Sanders -

Consensus, Models & Predictions vs. REALITY -

TAGS: global warming myth hoax climate change scam green energy farce consensus models predictions reality ipcc al gore greenies alarmists warmists
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - April 4, 2015, 12:39 pm
Here's a possible explaination, http://www.cato.org/blog/you-ought-have-look-climate-sensitivity-environmental-worries-are-trending-downward

Traitor John -

Getting What They Asked For & Receiving What They Deserve -

TAGS: baltimore black lives matter freddie gray ferguson effect police presence no justice no peace stephanie rawlings blake marilyn mosby al sharpton race baiters naacp grievance industry cpusa blacklivesmatter eric garner hands up dont shoot michael brown
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

MMessEnnBeeCee - June 2, 2015, 7:54 am
Try to figure out why people think a comment is written about them. I mentioned no names, but said some people had the IQ of a dead tree. Someone here decided it must be them that I'm talking about. Now try to figure out why they would think that. lol
guest818 - June 2, 2015, 4:39 am
EMMa, for someone incapable of getting their b***ons pushed, you sure get your b***ons pushed a lot.
rebeccaolsen - June 1, 2015, 6:30 pm
Of course. Because MMessEnnBeeEss WAS talking about me :) It just pushes his bu'ttons when people see right through him, and he gets so embarrassed about it that he tries to cover it up(and other things)by playing 'stupid' about it. Well, I buy 'that' :)
OTC - June 1, 2015, 5:55 pm
She must have "reasonably inferred" you were talking about her, despite "they" in the sentence
rebeccaolsen - May 31, 2015, 8:42 pm
But carry on, you are so cute when you fail troll. :)
rebeccaolsen - May 31, 2015, 8:41 pm
That is still p.ushing your b***ons hun? Aren't you supposed to be "ignoring" me, hun? (#76501) Using OTC to passive-aggressively respond to the things I say, this time "the great comment debate"(#76634,#76635)really doesn't fit the definition of ignoring
MMessEnnBeeCee - May 31, 2015, 6:15 pm
Have you ever noticed how they all claim to have degrees, yet can't even grasp how comments work. I think their degrees are in underwater basket weaving.
OTC - May 31, 2015, 5:16 pm
Liberals are such a joke, and they wonder why we laugh at them.

DISSENT IS NOT RACISM - No matter how much he and his blind followers would like everyone to believe it is.

GOVERNMENT - how much did they cut their pay? $0.00

HOUSE AND SENATE - American government, business as usual

DISSENT IS ONLY PATRIOTIC - if you are a Democrat. Free Speech applies only to Liberals. Liberals are for Free Speech... As long as you agree with them!

Scientific Consensus on Global Warming??? -

TAGS: global warming consensus climate change hoax scam farce michael crichton junk science green religion alarmists warmists greenies al gore ipcc agenda21
Rating: 4.71/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - April 25, 2015, 9:29 pm
I've seen worse, Ala 62039. Being fired for pointing out AGW junk science.
OTC - April 25, 2015, 6:19 pm
You're wrong again, "activist" scientists, not scientists. Activist scientists have been caught drawing conclusions before doing the research, its not that hard to follow along.
calron - April 25, 2015, 5:00 pm
What's really bad is that natural variability could be used to support AGW, but some shout denier whenever you bring it up as a cause for warming.
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 4:48 pm
As long as it annoys Rebecca, it is worth it to me. X-D It's the only thing keeping me going, mate. :-) F*ck carrots and gum.
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:48 pm
Like when Rush Limbaugh lied this week about the Duke study. The authors of that study actually came out against him because the political media does this all of the time. That is scientists up in arm over being exploited in a non-debate
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:46 pm
By now, it's common sense knowledge in the world of academia that climatology firmly supports the theory of MMCC. The scientific community is not at odds over this. It's the public that is on the fence. Talking about it too much distracts from the issue
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:43 pm
Don't really care about any of that. If or when the media is wrong about MMCC, doesn't change the fact that the science community is firmly behind MMCC in both consensus and findings.
calron - April 25, 2015, 2:39 pm
Roughly 1.59% of the abstracts reach the conclusion that he says the majority agrees with. That's not in the ballpark. If he chose a different standard to measure the consensus, he could have got the 97.1%.
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:33 pm
the scientists will just get each other's back like some country club. That's absurd. That's not what peer review means. On this issue, there has been enough fact checking that this bias would've been revealed by the present.
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:31 pm
It would appear Faux is talking about peer-reviewed journals about climate change, not the consensus. Roughly speaking, virtually all of them ARE behind the MMCC theory. OTC's problem is he thinks peer review is biased because
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:27 pm
Cook is guilty of being sloppy, not being debunked. Roughly speaking, he was in the ball park. Again you are splitting hairs hun. Peer review has caught it. It's just not a big enough issue to matter. Climatology isn't up in arms over this for good reason
calron - April 25, 2015, 2:24 pm
I've red a few and this is not necessary true. Take Cook's census for example. It reaches a conclusion that is debunked by Cook's own numbers rather than reaching the conclusion supported by the numbers. Peer review should catch it, but it still happens.
OTC - April 25, 2015, 12:34 pm
Like the past 2 years of unusual cool climate is suddenly "just weather". Anyways, have a good weekend and break that cig habit, you're more amusing nicotine free :-)
OTC - April 25, 2015, 12:31 pm
*Sigh* Perhaps you missed my posts stating that I don't deny human impact (contributing), I'm fully aware of MMCO2 but I do deny it's the sole driver of current trends in CC. And I notice anything to the contrary of MMCC is not welcomed
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:23 am
Alrighty then. Off to start my weekend. A night of me designated driving for my friends while others get drunk :-/ WEEEEE! Anyhow, fun jousting with you mate. Let's do it again next week if the spirit moves us, OTC. Cheers. :-) Fox is off the air.
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:20 am
P.S. Don't think I didn't notice you abandoning your cosmic ray Henrik denier theory. ;-) Is science like a crap shoot for you? One of these days do you just hope to roll the dice 'just right' and find a random link that will finally pay off? X-D
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:16 am
The only Quote from that article that matters - "It does not, the authors emphasize, change the evidence of human impact on global climate beginning in the 20th century." #PWNEDYOURSELF
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:16 am
Even you admit, in your game of pigeon chess, that they are not removing the human element. You're grasping for straws - everything else you said is irrelevant in light of that concession.
OTC - April 25, 2015, 1:10 am
OTC - April 25, 2015, 1:08 am
Well even this states it doesn't. remove the human equation, but the climate models didn't predict a cooling and that has them confused, which is funny because not everything was used in the models because scientists didn't think it was significant
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:20 pm
...the peer rev.studies themselves are pretty dry and free of politics.They make for boring reads,like plumbing manuals.They are not to be confused with the lib media that reports and distorts them.Hope this helps to FINALLY clear that up. Cheers mate :-)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:20 pm
...the peer rev.studies themselves are pretty dry and free of politics.They make for boring reads,like plumbing manuals.They are not to be confused with the lib media that reports and distorts them.Hope this helps to FINALLY clear that up. Cheers mate :-)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:15 pm
...I think, sometimes, you are confusing the political conclusions drawn by the liberal crowd which I agree are conflated.However,the peer-reviewed journals simply say:MMCC is unequivocal.They do not endorse the dire predictions of Al Gore or the libs...
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:13 pm
...in that sense, we've always been in agreement. The libs, as badly as the GOPers, have dragged the science dialogue into the political gutter. And the libs have their own denier issue to deal with -- the anti-vaccination movement...
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:08 pm
...The scientists are just reporting their findings. How long and how bad MMCC will affect the planet is up for conjecture.All they can claim is it's happening and a serious issue.It's not meant to be a crystal ball about next years temps or Superbowl win
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:06 pm
P.S. Before you go down another rabbit hole, I can save you the trouble: all the consensus says about MMCC is that it is unequivocal.It doesnt claim to predict everything. It doesnt claim it will be the end of the world.The lib politicians are doing that
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 8:56 pm
Source? I think I'm sure about what you are speaking about. But with you, I can never be sure. ;-) Provide a citation, please. And yes, the MMCC debate ended more or less many years ago. It's not confusing for the scientists, just the quacks.
OTC - April 24, 2015, 8:51 pm
If the debate on MMCC is over, then why is there a global temperature conundrum that scientists plan to address this fall? I thought it was settled.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:20 pm
...except Scientology. You can judge Scientology. X-D
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:19 pm
Scientology was created in the 20th century by a science fiction author. An awful science fiction author. Religion of any kind holds us back. But none of us has the right to judge the other - Be you Xtian, Jew, Muslim, Agnostic Atheist...etc
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:15 pm
I actually respect religion even if I don't believe in God. I just don't respect fundamentalism. If you want to pick on a religion of liberal geeks, pick on Scientology. It has "science" in the title, at least. It is a liberal tard fest. X-D
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:13 pm
The science on MMCC is simply a report on the findings. Whatever problem you have with the politics of it comes with your own philosophical problem with how science works, which a**umes a theocratic pov as the inverse since you are making this about faith
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:09 pm
And by "theocratic", what I mean by that is - again, it's revealed when you overplayed your hand with your philosophical problem with science: Science doesn't pretend to be infallible. That is what religion is for. Science isn't a religion for geeks.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 12:53 pm
No, becca. Coffee. Lots and lots of coffee :-/ They have Taco Bell Mountain Dew Baja Blast in the can now for a limited time! :-D Now I dont have to sneak my McDonald's cup into there and steal it. X-D I can get my caffeine fix from the convenience store.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 12:51 pm
You have such unreasonable distrust toward science,wildly a**uming political bias everywhere you can.Yet you haven't a skeptical bone in your body over secular Christian ideology,which is rife with politics? You have a theocratic agenda on MMCC, mate(2/2)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 12:41 pm
It proves you are more than a simple contrarian. It proves you are delusional, mate. :-/ Your problem isn't with MMCC. Your problem is with science, and how it works. And your issue with it is a purely philosophical one.(1/2)
rebeccaolsen - April 24, 2015, 12:29 pm
You're actually on top of things for a change.Not that obliterating OTC's argument is rocket science.Regular science would do - something he doesnt comprehend.But a coherent argument from you,Faux? You must've remembered your nicotine gum this morning :)
rebeccaolsen - April 24, 2015, 12:21 pm
"when the facts show it is wrong following a proper scientific inquiry,which already demonstrated human-induced CC was unequivocal." Finishing that sentence for you,denier :) Know you wanted to imply politics or bias was behind the rejection.Not today hun
OTC - April 24, 2015, 11:37 am
I didn't state that he disproved MMCC. But this does prove that research that finds reasons for CC other than humans is rejected.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 10:23 am
And how does your idiotic anecdotal observations about weather counter my thorough refutation of Henrik? The man YOU CITED as DISPROVING MMCC?? Oh yeah,it doesn't because you can't - hence this LAME red-herring, Im sorry, I meant 'attempt at sarcasm.' :-)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 10:14 am
lol...You can't be serious, mate...lolololol...Yeah, the scientist's evidence vs. your own two eyes. Well...I went to China last year and didn't fall off the Earth. Guess those flat Earthers were right! X-D Hmmmm?
OTC - April 24, 2015, 8:10 am
Let me guess, a tornado? GW! a hurricane? GW! a blizzard? GW! so this cooler than usual weather must be GW, right? isn't that what the consensus is?
OTC - April 24, 2015, 8:07 am
We're told 2014 was the h**test year on record, yet when I'm usually experiencing several days in the 100s, we had 1, maybe 2 days in '14. & for the 2nd yr in a row its almost May but instead of the normal 90s we are barely hitting the 80 degree mark
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 10:01 pm
So please, mate, call me a "denier." In fact, I will be disappointed in you if you don't. Yes, I'm the biggest JUNK SCIENCE DENIER around. ;-) If in your game of pigeon chess that represents Check mate, then it's a game I'm PROUD to lose. #WINNINGBYLOSING
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:57 pm
But basically you say any interpretation of science you present is BEING DENIED if we disagree with it. Fair enough. I'm a JUNK SCIENCE DENIER. I see your junk science and raise you 10000+ peer reviewed studies and the 97-99% consensus that backs it.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:56 pm
It's point (B) you are refuting. Now with your debunked cosmic ray nonsense. The effectiveness of GCRs in cloud formation has been shown to be dubious. GCRs exert a very tiny influence over low-level cloud cover, not enough to account for sh*t.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:53 pm
But the reason WE KNOW man-made CO2 is causing GW now is because (A) CO2 in theory CAN cause CC (a point you've conceded) and (B) thousands of investigations by reputable scientists and have found the correlation in a myriad of ways that is unequivocal.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:52 pm
Just because man-made CO2 or cosmic rays COULD cause climate change, doesn't mean all climate change is caused by CO2 and cosmic rays. See what I did there? I included CO2 as well.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:50 pm
Sure...if all this happened, it could cause global warming. But there is ZERO evidence that any of this happened. And by pushing it, you are engaging in a causal fallacy. ie.Just because Socrates is a man, doesn't mean all men are Socrates.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:49 pm
In order for GCRs to successfully seed clouds, they must induce aerosol formation which THEN must grow sufficiently through the condensation of gas in our atmosphere to form cloud-condensation nuclei. Then his must lead to increased cloud formation.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:47 pm
FACT- Cosmic ray flux on Earth has been monitored since the 1950s, and has shown ZERO-ZILCH-NADA significant trends over that period. FACT - our global solar magnetic field also has NOT changed appreciably over the past thirty years.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:45 pm
However, it turns out that none of these hypotheticals that Henrik proposed are occurring in reality. For instance, a nuclear winter COULD create global cooling. But that doesn't mean nukes caused the ice age.lol.. What matters is the PRESENT causes NOW
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:39 pm
Hypothetically, an increasing solar magnetic field COULD deflect cosmic rays, which hypothetically seeds low-level clouds, thus decreasing the Earth's reflectivity and causing GW.That's his hypothesis.But is that ACTUALLY happening? Is it the reality now?
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:36 pm
In fact, it's funny, but you are pretty much just copying and pasting what Henrik is saying. I know. I checked. Again, here is the refutation mate--->
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:34 pm
You're simply posting something without demonstrating comprehension of the concepts involved.I gave you the methodology to verify your claims.You ignored it and simply repeated an empirically disproven concept.In other words,you're talking out of your a$s
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:31 pm
Mother nature is not denying the science. You are, denier. There are 4 requirements that must be true for his theory to be valid. They failed to produce results when tested repeatedly against empirical variables. And you are not replying to that.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:28 pm
And that didn't reply at all to the evidence I cited. Just more pigeon chess from you. Yes, you are good at the copy and paste function, mate. Now apply that same vigor to actually learning the science you deny. :-) You might learn something
OTC - April 23, 2015, 9:02 pm
You understand his findinds that when the sun is active, as it has been, it shields us from cosmic rays reducing cloud cover which heats up the planet. with the sun becoming less active, more cosmic rays will produce more clouds
OTC - April 23, 2015, 8:55 pm
The sun is going into a grand minimum, temperatures have flatten recently and scientists are suggesting a cooling period. There's too much invested in the MMGW hype to accept a Global Cooling. Everyone can deny that science, but Mother Nature won't
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:21 pm
It turns out that none of these Hen'schypotheticals are occurring in reality, and if cosmic rays were able to influence global temperatures, they would be having a cooling effect. This IS why he is ignored and why you don't know **** about MMCC.Cheers :-)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:18 pm
In summary,studies have shown that GCRs exert a minor influence over low-level cloud cover,solar magnetic field has not increased in recent decades,nor has GCR flux on Earth decreased.In fact,if GCRs did have a significant impact,cooling wouldve occurred
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:16 pm
3)Cosmic rays must successfully seed low-level clouds.4)Low-level cloud cover must have a long-term negative trend. Fortunately climatology had empirical variables against which they tested these requirements. Study after indie study debunked Hen's theory
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:12 pm
In order for this theory to be plausible, all four of the following requirements must be true.1)Solar magnetic field must have a long-term positive trend.2)Galactic cosmic ray flux on Earth must have a long-term negative trend
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:09 pm
, the Sun can turn the temperature up and down. ... As the Sun’s magnetism doubled in strength during the 20th century, this natural mechanism may be responsible for a large part of global warming seen then." End quack quote. (2/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:07 pm
Henrik Svensmark says -- It's cosmic rays! The quack says, "When the Sun is active, its magnetic field is better at shielding us against the cosmic rays coming from outer space, before they reach our planet. By regulating the Earth’s cloud cover,(1/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:05 pm
who also say radiation is proof of Jesus's resurrection because they claim it explains away the carbon dating which shows the Shroud of Turin to have originated a few hundred years ago, not 2000 yrs ago. Junk science is real neat, huh? (2/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:01 pm
He IS ignored because he was proven wrong. PERIOD. He blames everything and I mean EVERYTHING on cosmic rays, including evolution. Congrats! You know how to use Google, mate. ;-) While you at it there you'll find these Russian "scientists" too (1/2)
OTC - April 23, 2015, 5:09 pm
Like Henrik Svensmark who gets ignored because his research didn't coincide with the consensus
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 4:20 pm
Even so, Michael Crichton's opinion on this means about as much to the CC debate as Steven Spielberg's opinion. ie.Not very much. A poster like this plainly proves the deniers are simply trolling science. It is proof of nothing. 1 Lion
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 4:18 pm
We are discussing 10000+ studies, reproducible results, in what is called PEER-REVIEW. The consensus vernacular is plainly the "CC for Dummies" explanation for that.It is not meant as a substitute for hard science, which already exists for MMCC(2/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 4:14 pm
Michael Crichton, who is the author of this quote, never did a study on climate change. Nor was he a climatologist. The part you missed, though, was where he says: "what is relevant is reproducible results." Every major CC study has been reproduced(1/2)

Insane McCain -

Joni Ernst -

TAGS: conservative republican senate women feminism
Rating: 1.93/5

More politifakes by blesic

blesic - November 12, 2014, 12:10 pm
That's right. Both global climate change and religion have been accepted as fact.
jonny5 - November 12, 2014, 9:59 am
The argument that consensus confirms "man made global climate change" proves your point. Conversely religion's been around for centuries, so by the same logic as fewer and fewer believe that proves that it never was a myth and therefore must be 100% true
blesic - November 11, 2014, 11:55 am
If a myth endures long enough, it becomes accepted as fact.
jonny5 - November 10, 2014, 9:38 am
and the myth of liberal tolerance rolls on...
blesic - November 9, 2014, 3:19 pm
Yes, ban him! Definitely ban Johnny.
jonny5 - November 9, 2014, 11:31 am
blesic stands for "Believes Liberalism Enthusiastically Stereotypical Insensitive Caveman" If a Rep had written this they'd be tagged ***ist and the those on the left would call for their being banned.
blesic - November 8, 2014, 8:56 pm
Thank you.
Cannabal - November 8, 2014, 7:28 pm
blesic, you're all right.
blesic - November 8, 2014, 4:27 pm
At least I'm not a conservative buffoon. That's the lowest form of animal life in the country.
blesic - November 8, 2014, 4:27 pm
At least I'm not a conservative buffoon. That's the lowest form of animal life in the country.
diehard - November 8, 2014, 1:07 am
get a grip, get a life..wake up and welcome to 2014....what a buffoon
blesic - November 8, 2014, 12:14 am
Certainly not! This is 1961. Isn't it?
Mooooooooooooooooooo - November 7, 2014, 7:18 pm

"know their place" Are you stuck in the 1950's?
blesic - November 7, 2014, 2:05 pm
They should have income equality as long as they know their place.
diehard - November 7, 2014, 5:27 am
Still better than liberal douches who fail at both jobs
OTC - November 7, 2014, 2:15 am
Guess Hillary Clinton should stay out of the political race in 2016 with all these attacks on women by the left, cause y'know, war on women and all
OTC - November 7, 2014, 2:11 am
And here I was believing liberals wanted income equality and equal rights for women
blesic - November 7, 2014, 12:21 am
If she's in the national guard, it must be KP duty.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - November 6, 2014, 10:05 pm

Well put.
Olympusmanager - November 6, 2014, 9:54 pm
You know that you're talking about a Lt. Colonel in the National Guard, right? Why don't you enlighten the rest of us as to YOUR accomplishments, as soon as YOU finish the dishes. What a DERP!

Stupid Things Liberals Say -

FLUSH WASHINGTON IN NOVEMBER - Get involved and plug-in to your govermnent

THE BIG NUMBER - How much of this did congress cut? -0-

The general consensus -





TAGS: shovel ready sent to china
Rating: 4.27/5

More politifakes by foxrecon19d

foxrecon19d - September 23, 2012, 4:58 pm
Shovel Ready jobs was a project headed by Barack Obama himself. The promise of Shovel Ready jobs got Barack Obama elected. After the election, Obama joked that Shovel Ready went to China. The poster talks about Obama's project, not small business
terroraustralis - September 23, 2012, 3:56 pm
if the president had control of them, and it was his decision, WE WOULD BE LIVING IN A COMMUNIST NATION. think about that for a second.
terroraustralis - September 23, 2012, 3:56 pm
GrouchoMarxist - September 10, 2012, 10:39 pm
And give a pass to GM and GE on taxes?
JGalt - September 10, 2012, 10:03 pm
then why did he let GM create all those plants and jobs in China- Obamunism isn't working!


TAGS: common sense
Rating: 4.2/5

More politifakes by OTC

OTC - May 3, 2013, 4:45 pm
glad you recognize liberals are stupid
ipaprime - May 3, 2013, 7:59 am
last one no clue, but the current one is not over yet.
Renza - April 27, 2013, 2:54 pm
You really should try harder
ipaprime - April 27, 2013, 8:55 am
try http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2012/04/05/3471948.htm
OTC - April 26, 2013, 4:28 pm
Since I don't watch FoxNews, apparently, you watch it more than myself. When you say 'national' and 'we' you weren't talking about America?
crankyhead - April 26, 2013, 1:42 pm
Seriously though, OTC, what caused the START and the END of the last ice age? (What's the matter lil' buddy, question to difficult, or are you just a stupid liberal?)
Renza - April 26, 2013, 7:41 am
yes, two of those words were once I used, the rest is some gibberish you pulled out of some dark hole... like fox news
OTC - April 25, 2013, 9:19 pm
Your words, not mine
Renza - April 25, 2013, 6:12 pm
Your understanding of using a scope of reference is astounding... Either that or your fail trolling... I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and guess the latter.
OTC - April 25, 2013, 4:32 pm
'National scale'. So only Americans are polluters and creating man made climate change, I see.
Renza - April 24, 2013, 6:14 pm
It's a (very) small step in the right direction, but on even a national scale it's minimal. We really should be moving to better fuel sources anyway, viably renewable and eco friendly preferably.
OTC - April 24, 2013, 5:44 pm
So all the liberal efforts to have cleaner burning cars was a failure then
Renza - April 24, 2013, 12:11 pm
The global scientific community seems to disagree with your a***ogy in terms of end result. Obviously it's not something where everyone needs to quickly shut off their cars to save the planet before it implodes next week, but the effects will be tangible
OTC - April 24, 2013, 12:00 pm
Human impact is a drop in the bucket compared to mother natures impact
Renza - April 24, 2013, 9:11 am
As I said in less detail just a few posts up... It's a misconception that the argument is that global climate change (not "global warming" which is an inaccurate name) is entirely man made. The issue is that humans are impacting how it is happening.
OTC - April 24, 2013, 8:54 am
Its just common sense that man was not industrialized 10,000 yrs ago when the earth warmed up ending the Ice Age, so why do liberals think man is causing warming today?
Renza - April 24, 2013, 7:35 am
I personally am not a scientist, unless you're a cynic to the degree of saying all information is bs until you individually prove it, I'm sure the evidence provided by the scientific communities should be sufficient for you.
OTC - April 24, 2013, 12:47 am
Cranky, if you can't understand my previous posts, ask an elementary student to help you
crankyhead - April 23, 2013, 11:35 am
But seriously OTC, what caused the end of the last ice age?
PapaFox - April 22, 2013, 3:21 pm
It seems your determination to remain ignorant is strong. Good luck with that.
OTC - April 22, 2013, 2:53 pm
You admit then that all the liberal efforts with the Clean Air Act to reduce emissions, putting restrictions on vehicles to burn cleaner fuel, banning R-12 freon, that the man made global warming is still increasing. Liberal failure at its best.
OTC - April 22, 2013, 2:48 pm
So you admit it is only human activity that is causing global warming and nothing else, so again, what human activity caused global warming 10,000yrs ago ending the Ice Age, man inventing fire?
OTC - April 22, 2013, 2:31 pm
Renza, do you have proof that if man wasn't on earth, that the rate wouldn't change any slower? Do you know what the tempurature of the earth should be? Maybe the rate of change is approaching the norm
OTC - April 22, 2013, 2:28 pm
Cranky, if you can't understand my previous post, maybe an elemntary student can help you.
Renza - April 21, 2013, 12:20 am
To make sure I'm understanding you correctly, your argument is "la la la, I am not listening, la la la, there's no such thing as global warming nobody knows what they're talking about..."? paraphrased of course.
crankyhead - April 20, 2013, 9:03 pm
Seriously OTC, can you please enlighten the rest of us, please? What caused the end of the last ice age?
OTC - April 20, 2013, 8:23 pm
As if Guardian is a science source, thanks for the hypocrisy. Of course energy and auto industry are scared that the GW hoax will heavily tax them, which they will have to pass onto the consumers
PapaFox - April 20, 2013, 8:06 pm
So you go to a BUSINESS magazine to get information on SCIENCE? Dude, get serious! It's the energy and auto businesses that are the biggest global warming deniers.
OTC - April 20, 2013, 7:48 pm
Here is a reputable source-http://www.forbes.com/sites/markhendrickson/2012/09/16/climate-change-hoax-or-crime-of-the-century/
OTC - April 20, 2013, 7:06 pm
Did you miss #52035?
Renza - April 19, 2013, 9:44 pm
You appear to be misunderstanding the concept as a whole. Climate change will occur naturally, however human impact is impacting how and the rate at which the climate changes.
crankyhead - April 19, 2013, 9:27 pm
Pretty pretty please with a maraschino cherry on top.
crankyhead - April 19, 2013, 9:27 pm
But what caused the end of the last ice age OTC?
OTC - April 19, 2013, 9:26 pm
Liberals such as al gore blame industrial man for global warming to impose a carbon footprint tax. I have enough sense to know its not man made
crankyhead - April 19, 2013, 2:08 pm
Tenacity, my good man, tenacity. =)
Renza - April 19, 2013, 10:11 am
While there is a certain level of truth to that, I've lead many a fundy back upon and against their own arguments and "logic", usually all they do is just get mad and start repeating their talking points as if they were facts and saying your wrong.
crankyhead - April 19, 2013, 8:30 am
...dismantle their own arguments themselves, well, even the most obtuse of people can understand when they are lying to themselves.
crankyhead - April 19, 2013, 8:29 am
See, if OTC wishes to 'play along', he only dismantles his own argument. Which is kind of how you have to go about discussing reality with right wingers. If you dismantle their arguments for them, they never believe you, but if you get them to...
crankyhead - April 19, 2013, 8:26 am
The reason OTC won't answer my question is simple. If he comes up with the correct answer, then he admits that current human activity is having a negative impact on the climate. OTC would rather just call you and me stupid, rather than face facts.
Renza - April 19, 2013, 7:46 am
Is it not a question for a question and an answer for an answer? Give an answer get an answer, give a question, get a question. So evading an answer with a misdirecting question will simply lead back to another question.
OTC - April 19, 2013, 12:45 am
You answer my question with basically my question? Just can't play along, huh?
crankyhead - April 18, 2013, 5:01 pm
... then not being able to explain it yourself, would be as good a place to start as any, no?
crankyhead - April 18, 2013, 5:00 pm
So, OTC, can you or can't you explain it to us? I said please after all. Or, by not explaining it, is that just your way of telling us that you are going to start self-identifying as a liberal? I mean, if liberals can't explain global warming...
OTC - April 18, 2013, 4:43 pm
Apparently, you don't understand your comment to the question
crankyhead - April 18, 2013, 4:07 pm
OTC? Can you explain to us, what caused the end of the last ice age, please?
Renza - April 18, 2013, 2:09 pm
Al Gore is nothing more than an advocate... I can understand why you would feel he's considered a part of it given his a**ociation, but that's really like saying the westboro baptist church is the core of the Republicans and Christianity.
PapaFox - April 18, 2013, 11:57 am
Gore is not a scientist, and I've never claimed he was, so please stop telling lies. If you choose to ignore the facts of climate change despite overwhelming evidence, that is of course your choice.
OTC - April 18, 2013, 11:34 am
Al Gore is the front runner about global warming, I asked why liberals can't explain global warming that ended the Ice Age, post #52038 is your answer. So the out spoken liberal explaining global warming is a scientist according to you.
PapaFox - April 18, 2013, 5:50 am
Never said that. Fewer lies please.
OTC - April 18, 2013, 1:02 am
That is my question to liberals
OTC - April 18, 2013, 1:01 am
Papafox said so
StoneTools - April 17, 2013, 7:53 pm
crankyhead - April 17, 2013, 3:48 pm
OTC, there was a problem on the servers here last week, and my question to you got deleted. If it's ok with you, I'll ask it again: OTC, I would like to invite you, to explain to us, what caused the end of the last ice age, please.
Renza - April 17, 2013, 1:41 pm
Who said he was?
OTC - April 17, 2013, 11:42 am
I didn't know Al Gore was a scientist.
PapaFox - April 11, 2013, 11:19 am
Liberals don't. Scientists do. If you're HONESTLY curious, do a little reading on the subject from reputable sources.
OTC - April 11, 2013, 11:06 am
Why can't any liberal explain what caused global warming which ended the Ice Age?
PapaFox - April 11, 2013, 7:42 am
Especially when those facts threaten profits.
Renza - April 11, 2013, 7:34 am
It is always easier to deny the facts than try to understand them.
Rudedog - April 10, 2013, 10:19 pm
What scientists call non refutable evidence, politicians call a hidden agenda.
PapaFox - April 10, 2013, 8:10 pm
Don't be such a sap. Even Exxon admits it now.

OXYMORON - Democrats work hard

LEARNING FROM HISTORY - Russians executed muslim terrorists and buried them with pigs to stop terrorism. Spaniards in Sevilla stopped mosques by burying pigs on the grounds. Problem solved for Ground Zero!

MOORECUTS FOR SENATE IN 2012 - Help elect Cravin Moorecuts to the Senate in 2012!


TAGS: romney rasmussen poll obama funny
Rating: 2.33/5

More politifakes by romneyisatool

HRoark - September 21, 2012, 8:34 am
And in April/May when Obama wasn't leading in a major poll, that polling company found itself with a lawsuit from the Obama camp. He will "lead" in these polls no matter who has to be intimidated.
JGalt - September 20, 2012, 11:44 pm
And Reagan was down by 18 under mondale... lets wait to see who's right
GrouchoMarxist - September 20, 2012, 11:03 pm
One other thing that explodes your head are facts...
romneyisatool - September 20, 2012, 8:07 pm
TRANSLATION: You're pissing me off by rubbing it in my face that Romney is getting demolished by a liberal like Obama! STOP BEFORE MY HEAD XPLODES!
vbattaile - September 20, 2012, 8:03 pm
Keep repeating yourself and the posters.... BOOOORING!!
romneyisatool - September 20, 2012, 8:01 pm
Why not? He loves Obama. Plenty of sources on Google to back this up. Ask him yourself what he thinks of your birther/socialist attacks against Muslims? Or did you forget Ali's religion? Doh! PWN'D
romneyisatool - September 20, 2012, 8:00 pm
TRUTH TIME... Obama's been leading since April/May in EVERY MAJOR POLL with few expections... and Romney is currently struggling in the battleground states according to EVERY MAJOR POLL with few exceptions. The truth, go figure! LOL
romneyisatool - September 20, 2012, 7:58 pm
TRANSLATION: I'm a terrible liar.
vbattaile - September 20, 2012, 7:57 pm
I really don't think Cassius AKA Ali would take too kindly to comparing one of the greatest boxers of all time to the WORST PRESIDENT EVER
vbattaile - September 20, 2012, 7:55 pm
YAWWWNN... Romney's been leading since April/May... with very few exceptions... and Obummer is currently struggling in the battle states. Go figure!

CONGRESS - Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself. Mark Twain

" A FUNNY THING HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO THE 2012 ELECTION - WE WENT WEEKLY TO CHURCH. - Rejoice in the Lord always. I will say it again: Rejoice! Let your gentleness be evident to all. The Lord is near.Philippians 4:4-5.

Democrats Vs. Republicans -

Senile Socialist -

SEND US $5.00 - So That We Can Continue To Fight Against Private Citizen's Rights Of Free Speech.

NDAA - Signed it, but won't use it. Promise!

LIBERALISM - The cancer that eventually eats itself.

YOU EXPECT US TO BE STOIC? - While you live a lavish life and destroy ours? We're not Nazi's or the enemy nor your pheasants.

2014 Elections -

TAGS: rachel maddow 2014 elections colorado senate race commentary
Rating: 4.2/5

More politifakes by OTC

OTC - November 15, 2014, 5:00 pm
Or 'I will post a bill online so you can read it before I sign it"
Cyberhagen - November 15, 2014, 12:53 pm
or "This will be the most transparent administration in history", or "I will not appoint lobbyists", or, Don't cross the red line Bashir Al-A$$ad, or else..". or.. I could on.
OTC - November 5, 2014, 7:56 pm
Oh oh, how about "it's Bush's fault!"
EmmaRoydes - November 5, 2014, 7:52 pm
or how about when Harry Reid said all the people who told horror stories about obamacare were liars?
EmmaRoydes - November 5, 2014, 7:49 pm
Or any of these: http://www.politifact.com/personalities/barack-obama/statements/byruling/false/
EmmaRoydes - November 5, 2014, 7:45 pm
Or maybe If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor. If you like your health care plan, you can keep your health care plan.
crankyhead - November 5, 2014, 4:19 pm
"If you repeat a lie often enough, it can become truth…" You mean like State run death panels and Kenyan birth certificates?
Mooooooooooooooooooo - November 5, 2014, 1:50 pm

Considering some of the behaviour around here lately I'm understandably on edge. Nows not the time for cow tipping if you get my meaning.
OTC - November 5, 2014, 9:55 am
Relax moo, I'm just rattling your chain
Mooooooooooooooooooo - November 5, 2014, 8:17 am

I don't vote on Posters, but thanks for a**uming that.
JGalt - November 4, 2014, 11:43 pm
She insists that voting fraud does not exist. If you repeat a lie often enough, it can become truth, despite the stories about machines changing republican votes to Democrats. Yet we never hear of the opposite happening
OTC - November 4, 2014, 11:16 pm
Strange how my posters just get approval and already have 1 lion votes, mod low balling posters?

THE U.S. SENATE - A group of people who individually can do nothing, but who, as a group, can meet and decide that nothing can be done.

STILL VOTING PRESENT - On Unemployment, BP Oil Spill, Christmas Bomber, The Economy Ft Hood, Memorial Day, and D-Day.

THIS GUY'S SO FAT - I doubt Michelle Obama's health fitness plan could help him lose weight.

SOLIDARITY - Help is on the way.

BEING PRESENT - Sorry Mr. Obama, its "President", not "Present".

Selective rights -

HILLARY QUOTE - Yes, its true!

low information voters -

Obama's promises -

'Democrats are about control' -

SOLICITING THE SENIOR VOTER - That might work, Newt.

Hijack -

Articulating Dissent -

TAGS: freedom dissent anarchy personal rights
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by Greybeard

fauxnews - July 28, 2014, 3:50 pm
No s'hit. I'm with you there, mate.
Greybeard - July 28, 2014, 1:29 am
Thank you. I'm getting to the post where I've lost all hope for our species :)
Zeitguy - July 28, 2014, 12:55 am
Your posts give me hope for mankind.
Greybeard - July 27, 2014, 10:38 pm
Thank you :)
Zeitguy - July 27, 2014, 11:37 am
Zeitguy - July 27, 2014, 11:37 am
There's know room thoughtful insight here.


essential -

TAGS: essential
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by JGalt

StoneTools - October 29, 2013, 2:16 pm
You should use the news sources that faux pas uses: National Enquirer, Das Kapital, and Pravda. that's when he can't get Al Jazeera.
fauxnews - October 29, 2013, 8:37 am
Wanna know what else rhymes with tool? STool. X-D Of all the names to pick Arrny!..lol..And the best part of it is knowing that you now regret that choice..big time. :-) Tissue?
fauxnews - October 29, 2013, 8:33 am
*yawn* That's why you have Foxnews JGalt, the #1 rated News network in America, according to them, which has been pretty hard on Obama. If the most watched news network has been hard on ole' O then doesn't that contradict your argument just a wee bit?lol
StoneTools - October 29, 2013, 8:13 am
FauxPas just has to be a tool, he can't help it, the doctor performing his lobotomy was drunk and took out almost the entire brain (all 3 cells)
JGalt - October 29, 2013, 6:46 am
that does that have to do with the subject at hand? Liberal distractions. The point is if a Rebublican had plotted so much evil during the shutdown, the press would be covering it 24/7 for the remainder of his term in office, etc, but liberal denial....
fauxnews - October 27, 2013, 10:01 pm
According to you last year, and your predictions, they were supposed to be cooking for Romney by this time. Nice to know Obama gets to enjoy 4 more years of those meals, on your American tax dollars no less. How did that work out for you, mate? LOL
JGalt - October 27, 2013, 9:19 pm
Including the costly head pastry chef!
StoneTools - October 27, 2013, 8:08 pm
and the white house chefs were declared essential.

Referendum -

CAMPAIN FINANCE REFORM - Is easier to get around than the US Border. That's what happens when the PEOPLE who make the Rules... Benifit by you breaking the Rules!

If the recession is over -

The liberal war on women -

Senate -

consent? -

Those who cannot remember the past.... -

God help us -

Representative -

Know Too Much -

Common sense -

Senate votes down Veterans Benefits Bill -

Another McCain moment brought to you by Senility -

THE TRUTH - shall set you free

Congress should heed this. -

A promising career in politics -

Rep. Raul Labrador -


IF WILL ROGERS WERE ALIVE - He'd have said something like this

Can't get your way? -

Draconian leadership -

Common Sense & Self- Discipline -


DURBIN - Dimwit Undermining Republican Benevolence In Negotiations


SENILITY - Maya Angelou claims Obama has done an amazing job, kept his campaign promises, and made life better for African Americans.

If Obamacare passed without Republican votes -

Ohhh -

TAGS: sense
Rating: 4.56/5

More politifakes by JGalt

TAXMAGEDDON IS COMING - Obama Lies Taxation without respresentation!

TAGS: taxation without representation
Rating: 4.56/5

More politifakes by JGalt

GrouchoMarxist - September 30, 2012, 9:45 am
And the democrats go wild...

ONE OF THE BOYS - In terms of Sports, in Barney's own words- he's "no wonger a tight end but now a wide wecievah". He'd be well wecieved in pwison.

Idiots: You know 'em as soon as they open their mouths -


instead of names and mascots -

TAGS: stupid insensitive liberals
Rating: 4.43/5

More politifakes by OTC

Zeitguy - June 27, 2014, 1:07 am
Pretty sure mathematicians are never offended of such illogical rhetoric .
Curlyrocks - June 26, 2014, 10:46 pm
Well at least the skin of those potato's is actually red.

MORE CONCERNED ABOUT RE-ELECTION - Than Standing By Your Core Values !!

SENSIBLE TACTICS - why try to convince the other side that their candidate will lose... do you REALLY want to motivate them to get out and vote? isnt the point, to convince them to stay home?

IN THE IL STATE SENATE- HE VOTED "PRESENT" - Now he votes "present" on the links!

TAGS: present
Rating: 4.43/5

More politifakes by JGalt

PILLAGED, PLUNDERED, RANSACKED - The most uncommon thing today is having common sense ... Even MORE rare in Washington!

RETIREMENT IS TOO GOOD - for this crook. At least we won't be seeing his Fannie after 2012!